Cryptocurrency Community Calls for Deletion of Satoshi Nakamoto's Account
A popular microblogging service, formerly known as Twitter, has witnessed an unusual call that has sparked discussions within the cryptocurrency community. A user known as Pledditor expressed dissatisfaction with an account claiming to belong to Satoshi Nakamoto, the legendary creator of Bitcoin. He pointed out that both the account impersonating Nakamoto and the one with the username "Bitcoin" should be removed as they, in his opinion, violate the platform's rules against "misleading and deceptive" identities.
Citing the rules of the microblogging platform, Pledditor emphasized that wrongfully impersonating someone else and creating parody accounts without disclosing this fact are not allowed. He likened this situation to creating a fake account in the name of Tesla or Elon Musk. This raises questions about the rules and norms applied to such accounts on social media and how they are perceived by the community.
Account of Satoshi Nakamoto: Intrigue and Mystery
There exists an account with the username Satoshi X, managed by a user named Andy Row, who claims to have been posting messages on behalf of Satoshi Nakamoto since 2018. This situation has piqued significant interest within the community, with many wondering whether this could indeed be the creator of Bitcoin or merely a parody.
It's worth noting that the account was virtually inactive since October 31, 2018, but it once again drew the community's attention after the publication of a cryptic message stating that "Bitcoin is a predicate machine." This has led to numerous questions and speculations about the true identity of Satoshi Nakamoto and their connection to this account.
Support and Discussion
Pledditor's post has garnered support within the cryptocurrency community, with some referring to it as an account causing "confusion." Many support the idea of deleting the account, believing that it poses a potential threat to trust in cryptocurrency and the community.
One user even shared that they had previously attempted to contact the platform's administrators regarding these accounts, but their inquiries were ignored. Another user likened this situation to a previous case where the microblogging platform's administration responded to an account with the descriptor "@internet" and blocked it.